Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter.

PURPOSE: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have a low risk of metastasis and a generally favourable prognosis. Patients with small type I g-NENs (≤10 mm) frequently require no treatment, whereas those with larger polyps usually undergo resection. We evaluated the safety and outcomes of endoscopic surveillance after no initial treatment in selected patients with type I g-NENs. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of type I g-NEN patients across two European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society Centers of Excellence 2003-2019. RESULTS: Following initial assessment, 87 of 115 patients with type I g-NEN (75 with polyps ≤10 mm) received no initial treatment and underwent endoscopic surveillance. 79/87 (91%) demonstrated no clinically meaningful change in tumour size or grade over a median 62 month follow up. Only two patients developed NEN progression that required a change in management and two other patients developed gastric adenocarcinoma/high grade dysplasia; all four initially had ≥11 mm g-NENs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ≤10 mm type I g-NENs were unlikely to develop clinically significant tumour progression and in most cases, resection was not needed. The endoscopic surveillance interval could therefore potentially be safely increased to every 2-3 years in such patients. However, lifelong surveillance is still advocated due to the additional risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma.

New Developments in Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) are a rare type of stomach cancer. The three main subtypes have different pathogeneses, biological behaviours and clinical characteristics, so they require different management strategies. This article will provide an overview of g-NENs and highlight recent advances in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular profiling has revealed differences between indolent and aggressive g-NENs, as well as a new somatic mutation responsible for some familial type I g-NENs. Novel biomarkers have been developed which will hopefully improve diagnosis, treatment, risk stratification and follow-up. Patient treatment is also changing, as evidence supports the use of less aggressive options (e.g. endoscopic surveillance or resection) in some patients with more indolent tumours. g-NEN heterogeneity poses challenges in understanding and managing this rare disease. More basic science research is needed to investigate molecular pathogenesis, and future larger clinical studies will hopefully also further improve treatment and patient outcomes.

Is local excision sufficient in selected grade 1 or 2 type III gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms?

PURPOSE: Type III gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) have historically been regarded as aggressive tumours, hence current guidelines advocate radical surgery with lymph node dissection. Data on the roles of endoscopic or less extensive surgical resections are more limited. The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic or limited surgical resection for localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs when compared to radical surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with a localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs across six tertiary NEN centers between 2006 and 2019. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were diagnosed with a potentially resectable grade 1 or 2 type III g-NEN of whom 36 underwent either endoscopic or surgical resection. No statistically significant differences were found between the three resection groups in terms of patient age, tumour location, grade or size. Only tumour size was found to be significantly associated with poor clinical outcome (p = 0.012) and ROC curve analysis identified tumour size >10 mm as a negative predictor (AUC:0.8030, p = 0.0021). Tumours >10 mm were also more likely to be associated with lymph node metastases on imaging and histology (p = 0.039 and p = 0.026 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Localised grade 1 or 2 type III g-NENs had a good prognosis in this series. Tumour size >10 mm was the most significant prognostic factor affecting patient outcome. Endoscopic resection or limited surgical resection is feasible and safe in small type III g-NENs which demonstrate favourable grade 1/2, well differentiated histology.

A "Watch and Wait" Strategy Involving Regular Endoscopic Surveillance Is Safe for Many Patients with Small, Sporadic, Grade 1, Non-Ampullary, Non-Functioning Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumours.

INTRODUCTION: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (d-NETs) are rare but are increasing in incidence. Current ENETS guidelines advocate resection of all localized d-NETs. However, "watch and wait" may be appropriate for some localized, small, grade 1, non-functioning, non-ampullary d-NETs. We evaluated whether patients with such d-NETs who chose "watch and wait" involving regular endoscopic surveillance had equivalent disease-related outcomes to patients undergoing endoscopic or surgical resection. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with histologically confirmed d-NETs at Liverpool ENETS Centre of Excellence 2007-2020. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were diagnosed with d-NET of which 50 were sporadic, non-functioning, non-ampullary tumours. Patient treatment groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and tumour location and grade, but unsurprisingly, larger tumours (median diameter 17 mm [p < 0.0001]) were found in the surgically treated group. Five patients underwent surgical resection with no evidence of tumour recurrence or disease-related death. Twelve patients underwent endoscopic resection (ER), with 1 local recurrence detected during follow-up. Thirty patients (28 with d-NETs ≤10 mm) underwent "watch and wait" with resection only if tumours increased in size. The d-NETs in 28/30 patients remained stable or decreased in size over a median 27 months (IQR: 15-48, R: 3-98). In 7 patients, the d-NET was completely removed by avulsion during diagnostic biopsy and was not seen at subsequent endoscopies. Only 2 patients showed increased d-NET size during surveillance, of whom only one was fit for ER. No NET-related deaths were documented during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: All of the localized, ≤10 mm, grade 1, non-functioning, non-ampullary d-NETs in this cohort behaved indolently with very low risks of progression and no tumour-related deaths. "Watch and wait," therefore, appears to be a safe alternative management strategy for selected d-NETs.

Systematic review: management of localised low-grade upper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of the stomach and duodenum are rare, but are increasing in incidence. Optimal management of localised, low-grade gastric and duodenal NETs remains controversial. AIMS: To systematically review recent literature that has evaluated the management of localised low-grade gastric and duodenal NETs. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted. Articles were screened and eligible articles fully assessed. Additional articles were identified through the included articles' reference lists. RESULTS: Several relevant retrospective case series were identified, but there was considerable heterogeneity between studies and they reported a variety of parameters. Type I gastric NETs had an excellent prognosis and conservative management approaches such as endoscopic surveillance/resection were appropriate in most cases. Many type III gastric NETs were low grade and appeared to have a better prognosis than has previously been appreciated. Endoscopic rather than surgical resection was therefore effective in some patients who had small, low-grade tumours. Duodenal NETs were more heterogenous. Endoscopic resection was generally safe and effective in patients who had small, low-grade, nonfunctional, non-ampullary tumours. However, some patients, especially those with larger or ampullary duodenal NETs, required surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Most type I gastric NETs behave indolently and surgical resection is only rarely indicated. Some type III gastric and duodenal NETs have a worse prognosis, but selected patients who have small, localised, nonfunctional, low-grade tumours are adequately and safely treated by endoscopic resection. Due to the complexity of this area, a multidisciplinary approach to management is strongly recommended.

Netazepide Inhibits Expression of Pappalysin 2 in Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with autoimmune atrophic gastritis and achlorhydria, hypergastrinemia is associated with the development of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs). Twelve months of treatment with netazepide (YF476), an antagonist of the cholecystokinin B receptor (CCKBR or CCK2R), eradicated some type 1 gNETs in patients. We investigated the mechanisms by which netazepide induced gNET regression using gene expression profiling. METHODS: We obtained serum samples and gastric corpus biopsy specimens from 8 patients with hypergastrinemia and type 1 gNETs enrolled in a phase 2 trial of netazepide. Control samples were obtained from 10 patients without gastric cancer. We used amplified and biotinylated sense-strand DNA targets from total RNA and Affymetrix (Thermofisher Scientific, UK) Human Gene 2.0 ST microarrays to identify differentially expressed genes in stomach tissues from patients with type 1 gNETs before, during, and after netazepide treatment. Findings were validated in a human AGSGR gastric adenocarcinoma cell line that stably expresses human CCK2R, primary mouse gastroids, transgenic hypergastrinemic INS-GAS mice, and patient samples. RESULTS: Levels of pappalysin 2 (PAPPA2) messenger RNA were reduced significantly in gNET tissues from patients receiving netazepide therapy compared with tissues collected before therapy. PAPPA2 is a metalloproteinase that increases the bioavailability of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) by cleaving IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs). PAPPA2 expression was increased in the gastric corpus of patients with type 1 gNETs, and immunohistochemistry showed localization in the same vicinity as CCK2R-expressing enterochromaffin-like cells. Up-regulation of PAPPA2 also was found in the stomachs of INS-GAS mice. Gastrin increased PAPPA2 expression with time and in a dose-dependent manner in gastric AGSGR cells and mouse gastroids by activating CCK2R. Knockdown of PAPPA2 in AGSGR cells with small interfering RNAs significantly decreased their migratory response and tissue remodeling in response to gastrin. Gastrin altered the expression and cleavage of IGFBP3 and IGFBP5. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of human gNETS and mice, we found that gastrin up-regulates the expression of gastric PAPPA2. Increased PAPPA2 alters IGF bioavailability, cell migration, and tissue remodeling, which are involved in type 1 gNET development. These effects are inhibited by netazepide.

Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis from direct pancreatic juice collection in hereditary pancreatitis and familial pancreatic cancer before and after the introduction of prophylactic pancreatic stents and rectal diclofenac.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals from hereditary pancreatitis (HP) and familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) kindreds are at increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Premalignant molecular changes may be detected in pancreatic juice collected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The objective was to determine the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: A prospective study (1999-2013) was undertaken of 80 ERCPs (24 in HP and 56 in FPC) from 60 individuals and the impact of PEP prophylaxis using a self-expelling pancreatic stent and 50 mg diclofenac per rectum from 2008. RESULTS: There was no PEP in the HP cohort and 13 (23.2%) PEP from 56 procedures in the FPC cohort (P = 0.0077). Up to 2008 PEP had occurred in 7 (43.8%) of 16 procedures in FPC individuals versus none of 18 procedures in HP individuals (P = 0.0021). After the introduction of prophylaxis, the incidence of PEP fell to 6 (15.0%) of 40 procedures in FPC individuals (P = 0.0347).The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.23 (0.06-0.84) in favor of prophylaxis (0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with HP are at minimal risk for PEP. Although the risk of PEP in individuals with FPC can be reduced by using prophylactic self-expelling stents and diclofenac, it remains too high for routine screening.

The impact of positive circumferential margin on survival following oesophagectomy using the new 7th TNM classification.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies looking at the influence of positive circumferential margin (CRM) on survival after oesophagectomy are conflicting. This may be due to the fact that older versions of the TNM classification were used, which do not predict survival as accurately as the new 7th edition. We examine whether CRM involvement has an impact on survival when the 7th TNM classification is used. METHODS: Over a 10-year period, 199 patients who had undergone potentially curative resection for oesophageal cancer with postoperative histopathological T3 were identified. A total of 151 (75.9%) were found to have CRM involvement (<1 mm), and these were compared with patients in whom the CRM was free of tumour. Cancers were staged according to the International Union against Cancer TNM 7th edition. First, univariate and then multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the factors influencing survival. Potentially significant predictors (P < 0.1) from the univariate analysis were inserted in the forward-stepwise Cox regression model and was allowed to remain in the final model if a P-value of <0.05 was achieved. A sub-group analysis was also performed for different N-stages (N0-N3). RESULTS: After all analyses were performed, CRM involvement was found to have no effect on survival following oesophagectomy [hazard ratio 1.28 (95% CI: 0.82-2.01) (P = 0.28)]. This was seen for all N-stages. Stage of disease, age at operation, % predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second and shortness of breath [(according to New York Heart Association classification)] were all significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, it became clear that CRM involvement does not affect long-term survival of patients after oesophagectomy. Patients with CRM involvement should not necessarily be considered to have had an incomplete resection.

The influence of age on mortality and survival in patients undergoing oesophagogastrectomies. A seven-year experience in a tertiary centre.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of advanced age on the outcome and survival of patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer at a single high-volume centre. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital survival of 326 patients in oesophagogastrectomies (OGs) in a period from May 2001 to April 2008. We divided the patients into two groups. Group A (n=218) consisted of patients younger than 70 years of age, while Group B (n=108) consisted of patients 70 years of age or older. The two groups were comparable. In-hospital mortality for Group A was 11 out of 218 (5%), while in-hospital mortality for Group B was 13 out of 108 (12%). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.024). Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for in-hospital mortality after OG included age over 70 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.79], reduced % of predicted FEV(1) (OR=0.13) and cardiac co-morbidity (OR=2.53). Despite age over 70 years proving not to be predictive of survival (P=0.21), significant independent predictors were advancing age [hazard ratio (HR)=1.03] and stage of disease (HR=1.84). P-values were 0.0278 and 0.018, respectively. Increasing age is a significant risk factor for mortality and survival after oesophageal resection operations. This mortality is particularly high if associated with a preoperative cardiac or respiratory morbidity.

Anterior abdominal wall abscess secondary to subcutaneous gallstones.

Abdominal wall abscess secondary to spontaneous cholecystocutaneous gallstone fistulation is an uncommon presentation of a rare pathological process. Having been described relatively frequently in the 19th century, it is now much less common in the late 20th and early 21st century, probably due to earlier recognition of symptoms, better imaging and surgical treatment of biliary tract disease. Here we describe a report of a case with an unusual clinical presentation of the already rare pathological disease process of spontaneous cholecystocutaneous fistula.

Trypsinogen mutations in pancreatic disorders.

There are multiple PRSS1 mutations described in hereditary pancreatitis but only a minority of these are clinically relevant. The two most frequent point mutations are in exon 2 (N29I) and exon3 (R122H), found in diverse racial populations. Both mutations result in early onset pancreatitis but the mechanism underlying this phenotype is unclear. The frequency of these mutations in such diverse populations suggests they have spontaneously occurred many times. The origin of the major mutations may be explained by gene conversions, accounting for multiple founders. The implications are discussed in terms of mechanism of action of the mutations and clinical presentation.

Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on choice between small certain rewards and large uncertain rewards in rats.

BACKGROUND: Animals must frequently make choices between alternative courses of action, seeking to maximize the benefit obtained. They must therefore evaluate the magnitude and the likelihood of the available outcomes. Little is known of the neural basis of this process, or what might predispose individuals to be overly conservative or to take risks excessively (avoiding or preferring uncertainty, respectively). The nucleus accumbens core (AcbC) is known to contribute to rats' ability to choose large, delayed rewards over small, immediate rewards; AcbC lesions cause impulsive choice and an impairment in learning with delayed reinforcement. However, it is not known how the AcbC contributes to choice involving probabilistic reinforcement, such as between a large, uncertain reward and a small, certain reward. We examined the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the AcbC on probabilistic choice in rats. RESULTS: Rats chose between a single food pellet delivered with certainty (p = 1) and four food pellets delivered with varying degrees of uncertainty (p = 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625) in a discrete-trial task, with the large-reinforcer probability decreasing or increasing across the session. Subjects were trained on this task and then received excitotoxic or sham lesions of the AcbC before being retested. After a transient period during which AcbC-lesioned rats exhibited relative indifference between the two alternatives compared to controls, AcbC-lesioned rats came to exhibit risk-averse choice, choosing the large reinforcer less often than controls when it was uncertain, to the extent that they obtained less food as a result. Rats behaved as if indifferent between a single certain pellet and four pellets at p = 0.32 (sham-operated) or at p = 0.70 (AcbC-lesioned) by the end of testing. When the probabilities did not vary across the session, AcbC-lesioned rats and controls strongly preferred the large reinforcer when it was certain, and strongly preferred the small reinforcer when the large reinforcer was very unlikely (p = 0.0625), with no differences between AcbC-lesioned and sham-operated groups. CONCLUSION: These results support the view that the AcbC contributes to action selection by promoting the choice of uncertain, as well as delayed, reinforcement.

Molecular analysis to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in high-risk groups.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening of high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer has not been adopted because of concerns regarding specificity and sensitivity. Suitability of a combination of 3 novel molecular screening techniques was investigated. METHODS: Pancreatic juice was extracted from 146 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis, or biliary tract stones. p53 mutations were analyzed by using a modified yeast functional assay, K-ras status was analyzed using mutation-specific real-time PCR and the proportion of p16(INK4a) promoter methylation was estimated using comparative methylation-specific real-time PCR. RESULTS: p53 mutations were detected in 20 of 48 (42%) cancer cases, none of 49 controls, and 2 of 49 (4%) patients with pancreatitis. K-ras mutations were detected in 31 of 57 (54%) cancer patients, 13 of 61 (21%) controls, and 23 of 67 (34%) patients with pancreatitis. Twenty-six of 42 (62%) cancer patients had promoter methylation levels > 12%, compared with 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 2 of 26 (8%) with pancreatitis. Mutations in p53 or high-level p16(INK4a) promoter methylation occurred in 29 of 36 (80%) patients with cancer, 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 3 of 22 (13%) with pancreatitis. Three patients (8%) of 36 with cancer; 14 of 24 (58%) controls, and 13 of 22 (59%) patients with pancreatitis had no marker. The gallstone disease patients had a high rate of positive K-ras mutations, possibly reflecting the fact that they were not disease free. CONCLUSIONS: Combination molecular analysis increased the discrimination between patients with malignant and benign disease. This level of discrimination would allow patients in high-risk groups to be stratified from negligible risk to over 50% probability of an early cancer.

Cationic trypsinogen mutations and pancreatitis.

The discovery of PRSS 1 mutations in hereditary pancreatitis and analysis of how the genotype affects the presentation and progression of hereditary pancreatitis has led to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. Patients with hereditary pancreatitis present with symptoms at an early age and have a significant lifetime risk for the development of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency, albeit at a later stage than patients with either idiopathic or alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. There are distinct phenotypic differences between hereditary pancreatitis and with other types of pancreatitis. As many as 80% of patients with symptomatic hereditary pancreatitis have an underlying causative PRSS1 mutation; there are, however, few significant phenotypic differences between these PRSS1 mutations. TheR122H mutation is the most common PRSS1 mutation observed, and patients with the R122H mutation present earlier. This, however, does not necessarily translate into a more aggressive disease with respect to complications of chronic pancreatitis. Indeed, the age of presentation of symptoms may be a poor surrogate for predicting outcome, as inherited disorders of trypsinogen may cause subclinical attacks of pancreatitis, which ultimately lead to pancreatic destruction and dysfunction. All patients, irrespective of whether they carry a PRSS1 mutation, are at significant risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The risk appears to be insignificant below the age of 40 years, but it increases incrementally thereafter. Significantly, the risk of pancreatic cancer is not related to PRSS1 mutation type and does not appear to be related to the mode of inheritance. The role of SPINK1 mutations in modifying the expression of PRSS1mutations is unclear but appears to be of clinical importance. It is unlikely that they act as causative mutations per se, at least in the Western form of the disease. Additionally, they do not appear to have an impact on the penetrance of PRSS1 gene mutations in hereditary pancreatitis.

Cationic trypsinogen mutations and pancreatitis.

The discovery of PRSS1 mutations in hereditary pancreatitis and analysis of how the genotype affects the presentation and progression of hereditary pancreatitis has led to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. Patients with hereditary pancreatitis present with symptoms at an early age and have a significant lifetime risk for the development of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency, albeit at a later stage than patients with either idiopathic or alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. There are distinct phenotypic differences between hereditary pancreatitis and with other types of pancreatitis. As many as 80% of patients with symptomatic hereditary pancreatitis have an underlying causative PRSS1 mutation; there are, however, few significant phenotypic differences between these PRSS1 mutations. The R122H mutation is the most common PRSS1 mutation observed, and patients with the R122H mutation present earlier. This, however, does not necessarily translate into a more aggressive disease with respect to complications of chronic pancreatitis. Indeed, the age of presentation of symptoms may be a poor surrogate for predicting outcome, as inherited disorders of trypsinogen may cause subclinical attacks of pancreatitis, which ultimately lead to pancreatic destruction and dysfunction. All patients, irrespective of whether they carry a PRSS1 mutation, are at significant risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The risk appears to be insignificant below the age of 40 years, but it increases incrementally thereafter. Significantly, the risk of pancreatic cancer is not related to PRSS1 mutation type and does not appear to be related to the mode of inheritance. The role of SPINK1 mutations in modifying the expression of PRSS1 mutations is unclear but appears to be of clinical importance. It is unlikely that they act as causative mutations per se, at least in the Western form of the disease. Additionally, they do not appear to have an impact on the penetrance of PRSS1 gene mutations in hereditary pancreatitis.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of hereditary pancreatitis in Europe.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hereditary pancreatitis is an autosomal dominant disease that is mostly caused by cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene mutations. The aim was to determine phenotype-genotype correlations of families in Europe. METHODS: Analysis of data obtained by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer was undertaken using multilevel proportional hazards modelling. RESULTS: There were 112 families in 14 countries (418 affected individuals): 58 (52%) families carried the R122H, 24 (21%) the N29I, and 5 (4%) the A16V mutation, 2 had rare mutations, and 21 (19%) had no PRSS1 mutation. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to first symptoms for R122H was 10 (8, 12) years of age, 14 (11, 18) years for N29I, and 14.5 (10, 21) years for mutation negative patients (P = 0.032). The cumulative risk (95% CI) at 50 years of age for exocrine failure was 37.2% (28.5%, 45.8%), 47.6% (37.1%, 58.1%) for endocrine failure, and 17.5% (12.2%, 22.7%) for pancreatic resection for pain. Time to resection was significantly reduced for females (P < 0.001) and those with the N29I mutation (P = 0.014). The cumulative risk (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer was 44.0% (8.0%, 80.0%) at 70 years from symptom onset with a standardized incidence ratio of 67% (50%, 82%). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms in hereditary pancreatitis start in younger patients and endpoints take longer to be reached compared with other forms of chronic pancreatitis but the cumulative levels of exocrine and endocrine failure are much higher. There is an increasingly high risk of pancreatic cancer after the age of 50 years unrelated to the genotype.